Jump to content


Loyal Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by origin1950

  1. Hi Thomas,


    Did you already see the two added jpg links at the bottom of that chud-dot-com article? I don't know how to get them here, but one is a "higher quality grab" of the spoiler and the other is a "fan embellished" version that helped me figure out better what I was supposed ;) to be seeing frozen in the ice ...


    Actually, the fan one is also here: http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/foun...edible-hulk.php


    I thought you might be interested ...


    Thanks for the tip :)


    I had already seen the pics and that's the ONLY reason I found The Captain.


    I'm tellin ya, that cameo was just too small.


    Here are the pics from the article:







  2. Favreau was good, no doubt about it - but Norton went deeper and darker.


    The pace was all Leterrier's so he deserves credit too, but that pace would not have worked without Norton's depth.


    I bought the DVD Monday night and have already watched it 4 times.


    Bought IRON MAN 4 weeks ago and I've only put it on once.


    Favreau would go REALLY light with The Avengers, Norton/Leterrier would aim for a darker tone.



  3. You never know Tommy.... aside from the chandelier part, the gunfights might be pretty authentic-looking. 6 weeks until we know for sure.


    Nope, I already know.


    I've seen 3 Trailers and one action sequence.


    The gunfights are ridiculous.


    Lexi knew what she was saying when she said this Punisher film would be set in a surreal world.


    In 6 weeks I'm just gonna see the absurd gunfights fully.


    That's all.




  4. Here's another interesting nugget featured in The Incredible Hulk DVD...


    None other than STEVE ROGERS on that portrait.




    MARVEL really sucked out all the Capi juice from this film.


    That scene was removed along with the arctic opening.





  5. NEWS BULLETIN: There are 11 other members on this board that post here often.


    When you pull the "Don't you have anything better to do than post here" card on me, you are insulting THEM as well.


    *Honestly, that's the worst thing you can do on a message board.


    To add to that, you're making things a bit personal and there's no need for that.


    Post here to address issues that don't revolve around me.



  6. Thomas, I really don't mean this as an insult, but I feel bad for you. I thought you were filming a movie or something. Wouldn't your time be spent better doing that? In my own opinion, it just doesn't seem healthy for you to be spending so much time on this particular topic. When the movie comes out and sucks, what will you do then? Do you really think you accomplished anything? :(


    That's a really interesting way of saying something I don't wanna say.


    *Its also another way of bashing the concept of being an active member on this board ;)


    I don't appreciate that and I doubt others would enjoy hearing you say "You feel sorry" for us spending our time here on RAW.


    I KNOW you have an agenda that you try to maintain hidden, but sometimes the way you hide it is TOO obvious.



  7. If the topic is not worth discussion Thomas you won't hurt anyone's feelings by spending your time elsewhere in the forum. You have badgered this topic black and blue for pity's sake. Why stick around here just to constantly slam the movie and harp on other people's opinions? Trudell


    I wouldn't leave this thread or abandon my mission to expose Warzone's ridiculousness if Thomas Jane himself asked me to.


    I'm riding this to the end and that end is only 6 weeks away.


    *I'm glad to see MANY opinions on this thread not influenced by my own, have been able to see the truth of all this.


    Steve Gainer showed up to defend this crapola, The GPA attacked my boy Jane for being honest, Nomad and the IMDB crowd came here to bulldoze me...


    They all failed.


    Warzone will self-destruct on December 5th and I'll be here to witness the aftermath :)



  8. There's some Oscar talk surrounding Clint's role in the film.


    Personally, I think its the time he has in front of the camera that makes his performances so undeniably good these days.


    I think he's reached a point where he can't fail.


    He shoulda gotten Best Actor for Million Dollar Baby, but they screwed him as usual.


    This year his chances are mixed, but I think the Nomination alone would do him justice.



  9. No, its not ALL that matters - but it definitely makes a difference.


    As far as I'm concerned, Rollins' acting is better than Stevenson's.


    Outpost was crap and ROME isn't AMAZING.


    Rollins has a larger track record with smaller roles in REAL films.


    Plus Jane recommended him, so he must be good.



  • Create New...