Jump to content

Geow

Loyal Members
  • Content Count

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Geow

  • Rank
    Mud Whistle
  • Birthday 07/14/1977

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests
    Former filmmaker, current rabble rouser.

Recent Profile Visitors

472 profile views
  1. Hey there. That's not what I said. What I was saying was that the producers of The Dark Knight films walked right up to the "R" line, and then took a couple of steps back to make it PG-13. They were not "kid friendly" Batman films. Never said that there should be an R rated Batman film. Chacun son gout.
  2. Can't wait until your babysitting training video comes out. lol
  3. I think that Hollywood needs to start being a bit more responsible when it comes to films. The Christopher Nolan Batman films are NOT for children - but they're PG-13 anyway. The Heath Ledger Joker was NOT the Caesar Romero Joker. Ledger was actually terrifying. That is not a movie I would allow my children to see (if I had kids). Batman is a character that appeals to children. There were some pretty sadistic acts of violence in all three Dark Knight movies (like bombs beings sewn inside a character's stomach). That's another reason why any new films about The Punisher should be Rated R. Frank Castle is NOT a character for children. He is a very adult character, and to make a PG-13 film about him would be done just to make him more accessible to children. It would be very irresponsible. Castle is not only an R-rated character, but he's a hard R. Frank is all about punishing people who are clearly guilty, and if you go by the 2004 version alone, he makes the punishment fit the crime. He's very "fair" in how he goes about taking care of business. For example, if you're just a psycho who's harassing your girlfriend, you get smacked on the nose with your own knife and thrown down the stairs. Lesson learned. However, if you're a big Russian dude who makes a living by butchering people in cold blood, you get a pot of boiling soup in the face and your head smashed open. But none if this is for children. Children should not be exposed to Frank's exploits. That's why they have Superman and Spider-Man and the Fantastic Four. Frank Castle does not belong in a PG-13 film and he does not belong on television (unless it's HBO). Doing so would only be done to widen the audience and make him more accessible to children, and that would be wrong. Really wrong. As for there being too much violence in Hollywood films, I don't see them changing any time soon. As for the "Batman massacre," - blame the sicko who did it. He's the one who is ultimately responsible. I will personally never understand why anyone would do what he did. The only real blame that Warner Bros. has to shoulder is that they somehow made three Batman movies that should have been R-rated into PG-13 fare. When you think about the content, they're not really PG-13 movies - but they didn't show much actual blood and said "fuck" less than two times. Doing something like that with The Punisher would be the height of irresponsibility. Everything else aside, I'd like to know what possessed parents to literally bring infants to a midnight screening of TDKR. First of all, that's way too late to be bringing a kid that age to a screening of Bambi. The Dark Knight Rises had imagery that would terrify small children. It's been awhile since I've read actual comic books, but I'd like to know if the "Comics Code" is still in effect or being enforced? Can anyone answer that?
  4. A PG-13 Punisher film would be a waste of everyone's time. It would be a guaranteed fail. Don't forget about the Marvel Knights banner. It could still be R rated.
  5. It's been online for 5 days and you're almost at 2 million hits. That's pretty good. Maybe you could write a spec script?
  6. I think Frank has always been an equal opportunity ass-kicker.
  7. Agreed. I hope they keep Ron Perlman though.
  8. It's still surprising that it got released. These people really don't like taking any sort of criticism at all.
  9. Yes, and to this day I am surprised it got made.
  10. Wow... I just looked it up and it's actually real? AND they gave him a friggin' lightsaber? Unreal, man. You have to keep Frank grounded in the dirtiest kind of gritty reality or it just doesn't work. He's the guy who sticks up for people that nobody cares about. That's why people love him. He's not Batman with a billion dollars worth of gadgets. Just guns, maybe a bulletproof vest, and shitloads of balls.
  11. That right there is why you should be producing the next Punisher feature. Definitely got the right mindset.
  12. Whatever happens, I hope to see some more of these Punisher shorts. That might garner the necessary attention to get a new feature going. Who knows, you could be unknowingly creating a new business model that these H-woods turds have no choice but to pay attention to. Give them no choice but to realize that this stuff is good. One last question before I bounce: Who would in in a fight between The Punisher and the Mist monsters? My money's on Castle. Cheers, guys.
  13. Or George Lucas' Red Tails. Such a shame what happened there.
  14. Not just the funding, but the distribution. That's the real bitch. You can make an awesome flick, then get screwed if you can't find a distributor.
×
×
  • Create New...